Hiroshima: was it necessary the atomic bombing of japan a fine place to find quotes, biographies, links, and even the diary entries of the president and the secretary of war regarding truman's decision to bomb japan in late 1945. Five days later from the drop of the fat man on august 14th japan surrendered unconditionally was using the bomb necessary in the end there are many uncertainties and complexities surrounding the end of world war ii but the answer to the fundamental question of whether the use of the bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki was necessary appears to be yes. In this respect, hiroshima and nagasaki may have been the first shots of the cold war as well as the final shots of world war ii regardless, the united states remains the only nation in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on another nation truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military.
The invasion, if it became necessary, was scheduled to begin around november 1, 1945 (the world at war) was the bomb a necessary action to end the war truman was committed to ending the war at the earliest possible moment, and he wanted to save as many american lives as he could (the world at war. Was hiroshima necessary why the atomic bombings could have been avoided by mark weber on august 6, 1945, the world dramatically entered the atomic age: without either warning or precedent, an american plane dropped a single nuclear bomb on the japanese city of hiroshima. Drop the nuclear bomb 80,000 japanese people, mostly civilians, were killed instantly and up to 120,000 more died of causes linked to the bomb over the following decades have a nuclear demonstration.
From this perspective, the use of the new atomic bomb to force a rapid japanese surrender seemed a logical and necessary military action. Was the bomb a necessary action to end the war five days later from the drop of the fat man on august 14th japan surrendered unconditionally but the answer to the fundamental question of whether the use of the bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki was necessary appears to be yes it was becessary to end the war as qucikly as possible. Yes, it was necessary to stop the war the atomic bomb on hiroshima was brutal, yes on the other hand, it was the only way to stop the war japan was going to invade the us and we were running out of supplies, people, guns, bullets, etc.
More than 70 years after the us dropped atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki, the question of whether the decision was the right one is still being asked. The bombing of hiroshima on august 6, 1945, and of nagasaki on august 9 was followed by a rapid japanese surrender, an apparent vindication of the bomb’s use in anger. U can say it was necessary because even after hiroshima japan still would not surrender the usa had to drop a second bomb on nagasaki to convince the japanese that if they did not stop fighting their country would be obliterated. Was dropping the atomic bomb on hiroshima absolutely necessary of losing hundreds of thousands of more soldiers and the length of the long drawn out war were reason enough to drop the bomb maybe your grandfather or father could have lost his life in that war had the bomb not been dropped, had that happened you might not be here. On both occasions the all clear followed swiftly enola gay faced no resistance as it dropped the bomb forty five seconds later the city was destroyed in a blinding instant eighty thousand men, women and children were killed and tens of thousands wounded, disfigured and poisoned by radiation from the bomb.
In short, the first bomb was dropped as soon as it was ready, and for the reason the administration expressed: to hasten the end of the pacific war but in the case of the second bomb, timing was everything. The argument about the soviet role in japan's surrender has a connection with the argument about the soviet role in america's decision to drop the bomb: both arguments emphasize the importance of the soviet union the former suggests that japan surrendered to the us out of fear of the soviet union, and the latter emphasizes that the us dropped the bombs to intimidate the soviet union. Should the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki be considered a necessary action to end the war, or a needless and disproportionate one more than 70 years after the us dropped atomic bombs on.
So, on august 6, 1945, two days before the russians were to declare war against japan, the us dropped the bomb on hiroshima there was no risk to us forces then waiting for a japanese response to the demand for surrender.
Was it necessary to drop the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki the pros, the cons, and the ethics the atomic bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki is a very touchy subject for many people.